Behati Prinsloo

happyending

Rookie
Joined
Oct 7, 2014
Posts
189
Karma
100
Location
San Francisco, CA
Behati must only be about 5'8" then? Anyways, I think she's a very attainable sort of thin (because she's closer to the average female height) but still the thinnest of the Angels.
victoria-secret-leginy-foldover-pocket-legging-0.jpg.big.jpg

I love her legs here!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

happyending

Rookie
Joined
Oct 7, 2014
Posts
189
Karma
100
Location
San Francisco, CA
No, she's about 5'11"!
Really? She looks a lot shorter, probably because of her frame. I was comparing her to Karlie who's 6'1" in the picture posted a few posts ago. It still seems like even if they were both standing straight, Karlie would still be about an inch taller in flats while Behati's in 3(?)-inch heels. Maybe someone who's met her can shed some light? Because she really looks about 5'10" at the most and I'd always assumed she was one of the shorter angels.
 

71000

Super Star
Joined
May 11, 2012
Posts
4,757
Karma
1,077
Almost all of her modeling work is from Victoria's Secret, so I wonder how her career will turn out after she parts with Victoria's Secret. She never really caught on in HF like Adriana, Candice, and Karlie. I think she'll probably fade into obscurity, like Erin, and I see Lily going the same way too.

O9Xk3Ps.jpg

MCYWPuUl.jpg

tmrx2x6l.jpg

TsxGNDwl.jpg

1QszWMMl.jpg

cm1ujhTl.jpg

YtfX9kQl.jpg


Jt9uZeYl.jpg
L6soH4sl.jpg

W0bPvNQl.jpg
o7fIHLPl.jpg

wdRidkml.jpg
5LgIMBhl.jpg
 

Kacha

Runt
Joined
Apr 1, 2012
Posts
185
Karma
29
Location
Netherlands
Judging from the most recent photos on her thread, Erin's problem at least is a massive, horrible, frightening weight. If Behati keeps working hard, I can imagine her being in HF. She'd probably have to lose some more, though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

marieebo

Community Duchess
Joined
Nov 30, 2014
Posts
2,144
Karma
3,704
Location
Italy
I'm not a fan of her face (I think she's pretty plain) but I've never seen her looking this good, she has a very nice body.
 

Andrea

Super Star
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Posts
1,245
Karma
1,109
Location
Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
I am not impressed with her. She's the ultimate butter-face for one, and she has a higher body fat percentage than I'd like to see, especially for a lingerie and swimsuit model. She's an apple shape with skinny legs, a pouch and no butt whatsoever. Sorry, but I just don't find her attractive at all
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users

Arctic

Rookie
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Posts
183
Karma
147
Location
France
Well. She looks disgusting in my opinion.
 

Attachments

  • Capture d’écran 2015-05-09 à 11.14.28.png
    Capture d’écran 2015-05-09 à 11.14.28.png
    451 KB · Views: 139
  • Capture d’écran 2015-05-09 à 11.14.42.png
    Capture d’écran 2015-05-09 à 11.14.42.png
    480 KB · Views: 126

espressoenthusiast

SkinnyGossip Royal
Joined
Jun 27, 2012
Posts
3,868
Karma
8,212
Her body type reminds me a lot of mine (thin limbs, longer legs, 'soft' appearing midsection) so I'm very sympathetic. That being said, I feel like she has lost a lot of spark in her *face* lately? I can't seem to pinpoint it, but her eyes appear much less striking and she seems very generic to me now, even more so than usual--maybe it's because we see her everywhere now?
 

espressoenthusiast

SkinnyGossip Royal
Joined
Jun 27, 2012
Posts
3,868
Karma
8,212
Also I can guarantee you she definitely had a lot of fluids before that photo was taken (coachella=100+ degrees hot; unfortunately, most people look like they've waterloaded, even the skinniest of models I've seen there :cautious:)