I'm sorry to say she has a horse face, I don't like her in these pictures.
btw, she posted new photos from her shooting which look a little better than the previous, i guess
She must surely have at least one friend? The pic above with the bizarre legs... that shadow... someone took that picture for her.
I'd say that's about right. Her angles are very obscure in her pictures. Her waist may be 23 though. Hips/bust seem correct.I think those recent pics are definitely better at least! I like the first one from that group of the five photos. But I never noticed how weird her hairline is...
Here are her measurements though:
HEIGHT 176CM/5'9.5"
BUST 79CM/31"
SHOE 38 EU/7 US/5 UK
WAIST 61CM/24"
HIPS 85CM/33.5"
I'm thinking those can't be accurate...those are basically what my measurements are! I'm a little shorter but still. But I did find it interesting that you guys pointed out how she poses to make herself look skinnier. But at the same time, sometimes she does look genuinely skinny. What is the truth?
She said hips.24... okay...but remember when she said her waist was too thin and no one wanted to sign with her because of that?
24?!
Oh you're right.. it was hips! I forgot. I wonder if she was telling the truth.She said hips.
She could've been stretching the truth. She's always seemed to act a little strangely at the thought of modelling.
Really? IMG has girls with 32" hips and such listed. What is the 'ideal' for most 'high end' agencies?To be fair, a LOT of agencies put larger figures down as models' stats if they fall below the desired measurements (in the same way that they will often put 5'8.5" on record for a girl who stands at 5'6"). It's quite possible that hers have been pushed up a little to make her a bit more marketable.
Yes, and they most likely have 32" hips, however, so may some of the girls listed as 33", or 34". A girl listed at 33" may have 35" hips, or vice versa. Take model measurements with a grain of salt.Really? IMG has girls with 32" hips and such listed. What is the 'ideal' for most 'high end' agencies?
I wonder if she'll get work
That's quite interesting - thanks.Yes, and they most likely have 32" hips, however, so may some of the girls listed as 33", or 34". A girl listed at 33" may have 35" hips, or vice versa. Take model measurements with a grain of salt.
Generally the agency will have the models actual measurements on record, but either may not regularly update them on the website to take account for every minute fluctuation, or, for instance, if a model gains an inch or half an inch or whatever, they may choose not to adjust the listed measurements as it's expected that the girl will get back to her original size fairly quickly (even though that's not always what happens). Likewise, if a new face comes in with 31" hips, it's not necessarily going to attract the greatest number of clients so the agency may pop a 33" down in order to bring that measurement closer to sample size, and suggest some exercises for her to do and things to introduce into her diet to increase her hip measurement - in the same way they would do for a model who needed to lose inches to fit the same requirements.
That's quite interesting - thanks.
I always thought 'the smaller, the better' would apply in fashion.
I don't buy a lot of the stuff she says/posts. Like the hips thing and some of her distorted pictures. I kind of feel sorry for her. I hope the depression thing isn't just a coy and I hope modelling will help her find so,e friends. Needless to say though, I do love her physique.