Elle Fanning

Kit

Super Star
Joined
Jun 17, 2015
Posts
956
Karma
1,746
View attachment 16360
Maybe not but she definitely looks slimmer than Dakota these days. Her legs are definitely her problem area and need some definition but she looks better than most actresses these days.
I get the vibe that they're very different girls. Like stereotypical older/conservative sister and a younger/look-at-me sister. Like they have super different styles and generally take super different roles. I don't buy that they would compete hard against each other
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 1 users

bougainvilleas

Super Star
Joined
Feb 21, 2017
Posts
566
Karma
1,425
Location
New York
Elle is the cover of US Vogue this month and I find these pictures teeth-grindingly disappointing. If only she would work on her facial expressions and lose 15-20 pounds, maybe then she'd be worthy of a cover shoot... but these pictures are just so boring.





 
  • Agree
  • Sad
Reactions: 2 users

Thinkthin

Runt
Joined
Jun 19, 2017
Posts
64
Karma
28
Location
Texas
Elle is the cover of US Vogue this month and I find these pictures teeth-grindingly disappointing. If only she would work on her facial expressions and lose 15-20 pounds, maybe then she'd be worthy of a cover shoot... but these pictures are just so boring.





She has almost an Emma Stone look. Emma at her lowest was looking amazing so I could see potential here.
 

Ally

Rising Star
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Posts
2,097
Karma
633
Location
Canada
Her skin is to die for! I love how she always looks like the odd one out, a fairy lost among mortals on red carpets.
 

lilangel

Runt
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Posts
32
Karma
21
Location
NYC
Elle is the cover of US Vogue this month and I find these pictures teeth-grindingly disappointing. If only she would work on her facial expressions and lose 15-20 pounds, maybe then she'd be worthy of a cover shoot... but these pictures are just so boring.






i agree with you 100%! these are beautiful shots and she's a gorgeous girl but would really benefit from a little weight loss. Her face has little-to-no definition but considering she's pretty, I feel it's fair to assume that she'd look a lot better in terms of actually having cheekbones, etc. Even her arms and the visible area of her chest in the first pic would benefit a LOT from weight loss.
 
  • WTF
Reactions: 1 user

Lysa

Super Star
Joined
Jun 6, 2017
Posts
268
Karma
1,229
Location
United States
I feel bad but it's cracking me up that it looks like she's 5'2 now.
I hate when I see tall girls waste their height like this. I would kill to be that tall. I wish there were some way to just transfer their height to me, I would treat it well :nopity:
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 4 users

marieebo

Grand Dame
Joined
Nov 30, 2014
Posts
2,052
Karma
3,372
Location
Italy
I saw her in person recently and she didnt look significantly bigger.hm
I think she looks like she always did, she seems to be a pear and dresses strategically (lots of gowns, skirts ect) so she does seems skinnier than she really is but when she's wearing leggings you can really tell. She's beautiful regardless to me, I have the softest spot for her
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 1 user

gracilis

Grand Dame
Joined
Dec 3, 2016
Posts
605
Karma
2,480
I saw her in person recently and she didnt look significantly bigger.hm
Maybe she just has a really small bone structure despite her height? So she looks soft and doesn't have much definition to collar bones, defined limbs, even when at a similar size relative to other skinnies, if that makes sense. So she'd have to be a lower weight to "look" thin with more definition.
 

angelalamode

Super Star
Joined
Aug 1, 2016
Posts
329
Karma
1,013
Maybe she just has a really small bone structure despite her height? So she looks soft and doesn't have much definition to collar bones, defined limbs, even when at a similar size relative to other skinnies, if that makes sense. So she'd have to be a lower weight to "look" thin with more definition.
Yes! It's such a struggle being small boned. You kind of just have to decide to be super skinny, and it will take a lot of effort, but if you're willing you can be more tiny than most. However, even then you won't stand out as 'bony'. When you lose it's harder to appreciate the results because you don't get visible bones as easily. And if you maintain at an average-thin weight you never look as skinny as you should compared to others of the same weight.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 3 users

sabine

VIP - Insider
VIP
Joined
May 24, 2012
Posts
2,358
Karma
4,202
Location
London
I watched the premiere of the new season of Britain's Next Top Model (please don't judge me, I just was surprised it was still going and wanted to see if the quality of shoot/model/show formula had been updated to fit a world where most models are scouted through social media anyway) and thought one of the girls looked a bit like Elle Fanning if she were to slim down to a model size.


 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users

lolitasea

Rising Star
Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Posts
253
Karma
789
Location
New York, New York
Elle and I have a similar body type actually, although I weigh an estimated 15 pounds less. My legs from years of ballet will always have a layer of muscle, but my bone structure is TINY. Like a bird. So I can actually look a lot heavier than my best friend when we are the same weight, even though we are also the same height, because she has much bigger bones than I, even though my measurements are much smaller.

When I'm at my slimmest, it's great- because of the natural muscle tone from ballet I naturally have sculpted yet delicate legs that I don't have to train for, and look SO much taller.

Bloating is also everything- when you have small bones I think it shows up so much more. Elle looks rather bloated in many of these photos- I wonder if she cut out some carbs/ salt if she might look a lot better.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 1 user

gracilis

Grand Dame
Joined
Dec 3, 2016
Posts
605
Karma
2,480
I watched the premiere of the new season of Britain's Next Top Model (please don't judge me, I just was surprised it was still going and wanted to see if the quality of shoot/model/show formula had been updated to fit a world where most models are scouted through social media anyway) and thought one of the girls looked a bit like Elle Fanning if she were to slim down to a model size.


Apologies for being tangential, but do you mind sharing your insider perspective on any shifts in the shoot/model/show formula (from what you observed)? Thank you! :luvluv:
 

sabine

VIP - Insider
VIP
Joined
May 24, 2012
Posts
2,358
Karma
4,202
Location
London
Apologies for being tangential, but do you mind sharing your insider perspective on any shifts in the shoot/model/show formula (from what you observed)? Thank you! :luvluv:
None at all, it's so dated and cringeworthy. Will not be streaming episode 2 haha
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

espressoenthusiast

SkinnyGossip Royal
Joined
Jun 27, 2012
Posts
3,868
Karma
8,187
Elle and I have a similar body type actually, although I weigh an estimated 15 pounds less. My legs from years of ballet will always have a layer of muscle, but my bone structure is TINY. Like a bird. So I can actually look a lot heavier than my best friend when we are the same weight, even though we are also the same height, because she has much bigger bones than I, even though my measurements are much smaller.

When I'm at my slimmest, it's great- because of the natural muscle tone from ballet I naturally have sculpted yet delicate legs that I don't have to train for, and look SO much taller.

Bloating is also everything- when you have small bones I think it shows up so much more. Elle looks rather bloated in many of these photos- I wonder if she cut out some carbs/ salt if she might look a lot better.
Agree on every single front. small boned people are much more prone to looking "squishy" than bigger boned girls....I never want to trade my narrow feet and 4.5 inch wrists for anything though.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 2 users