• You can now apply for Skinny Gossip membership online. Click here to begin.
  • We are getting a lot more membership applications than we expected. Be patient while we work through the pile. DO NOT submit a second application!!

BAD Vogue Covers

clairefhjao

Grand Dame
Joined
Aug 1, 2015
Posts
1,175
Karma
2,414
Location
here and there
View attachment 59364
“Taylor on Sexism, Scrutiny and Standing Up for Herself” Never thought there’d be a worse September Issue than Kendull’s but here we are!
Obviously a model would be asking too much but this is some foolishness.
Photographer: to fire
Stylist: to fire
Art Director: to fire
Anna Wintour (iconic but you’re time has come): to retire and move to Iowa as hermit.

And what the hell is that pose who the hell is she pointing at and mostly: is she still relevant??? (I have zero knowledge about pop music I was left at “shake it off”)
 

FlatWhite

Worker Bee
Joined
Jun 18, 2019
Posts
144
Karma
363
Location
London
Obviously a model would be asking too much but this is some foolishness.
Photographer: to fire
Stylist: to fire
Art Director: to fire
Anna Wintour (iconic but you’re time has come): to retire and move to Iowa as hermit.

And what the hell is that pose who the hell is she pointing at and mostly: is she still relevant??? (I have zero knowledge about pop music I was left at “shake it off”)
I cannot tell if this was intentional or not but this cover is far too similar to an Uncle Sam poster for my comfort :seeya:

View attachment 59369
Yes, it is a direct reference. And the intertextuality is deeper than it may seem. The pose and facial expression is the most obvious link and almost instantly brings the poster to mind (especially in America where patriotism is a big part of the national identity). The colour palette of the cover remains similar to the one of the original poster, too. Taylor's blue suit is a modern female variation of Uncle Sam's which is supposed to symbolize the equality, women empowerment and their independence. The fact that she points with a different hand than the OG may be a twist emphasizing a different gender aka "we (women) are equal to men despite the differences in gender, let us have our voice".

The styling is not accidental, look at her hair. It is a copy of USam's hairstyle (and thus I don't agree the stylist is to blame. It looks shitty on her but it's a pretty successful allusion. So in theory, it's a job well done). The rings are metal and chunky. I bet it, again, is a feminine twist on a Dog tag (the army's "jewellery"). Back to the suit: it's open the same way Sam's is but on the other side (again - details are important). White stripes on Taylor's make it look business-like (equality to men, office jobs + equal salary for women, celebrating the right to vote etc. once more) but still has shoulder pads and looks pretty masculine in a typical fashion sense. Finally, nude nails are coherent with the whole modern-girl-Uncle-Sam look as well.

It's a very American thing to do. Put a celebrity on a SEPTEMBER (let's not forget about that) issue in a patriotic context and call it a day. Do I like the cover? No. But will it sell? Hell yes.
 

clairefhjao

Grand Dame
Joined
Aug 1, 2015
Posts
1,175
Karma
2,414
Location
here and there
Yes, it is a direct reference. And the intertextuality is deeper than it may seem. The pose and facial expression is the most obvious link and almost instantly brings the poster to mind (especially in America where patriotism is a big part of the national identity). The colour palette of the cover remains similar to the one of the original poster, too. Taylor's blue suit is a modern female variation of Uncle Sam's which is supposed to symbolize the equality, women empowerment and their independence. The fact that she points with a different hand than the OG may be a twist emphasizing a different gender aka "we (women) are equal to men despite the differences in gender, let us have our voice".

The styling is not accidental, look at her hair. It is a copy of USam's hairstyle (and thus I don't agree the stylist is to blame. It looks shitty on her but it's a pretty successful allusion. So in theory, it's a job well done). The rings are metal and chunky. I bet it, again, is a feminine twist on a Dog tag (the army's "jewellery"). Back to the suit: it's open the same way Sam's is but on the other side (again - details are important). White stripes on Taylor's make it look business-like (equality to men, office jobs + equal salary for women, celebrating the right to vote etc. once more) but still has shoulder pads and looks pretty masculine in a typical fashion sense. Finally, nude nails are coherent with the whole modern-girl-Uncle-Sam look as well.

It's a very American thing to do. Put a celebrity on a SEPTEMBER (let's not forget about that) issue in a patriotic context and call it a day. Do I like the cover? No. But will it sell? Hell yes.
I like your analysis and I agree with the analogy, but I don’t think the average Vogue US reader would have the same thinking process. In my opinion the final result at first sight doesn’t look patriotic. Again, i agree that a September patriotic cover would sell, but it also has to catch the attention.