Discussion in 'Models' started by marieebo, Sep 29, 2016.
Here's a photo from September 2017 -
And this is flabby to you? Lmfao my god
I agree with @xxAudreyxx somewhat, her upper arms in that one pic don't look great, but they don't look flabby either. Also it's hard to judge from just one pic. She looks very good in the pics @espressoenthusiast posted.
She looks quite slim, but in terms of fitspo, she doesn’t strike me as someone who ‘works out’. She seems to me (and from what I’ve gathered from her Instagram) that she’s hot and young and doesn’t really need to work out. She seems to prefer a more fast and grungy party lifestyle.
I some what agree but she does work out and it shows, she's not skinny fat at all.
Just ate dinner next to her- she's 5'6.5 max. Great proportions though.
were you able to see what she had? I like her body... her face is not that remarkable. Pretty, yes, but nothing extra special about it...
I agree that "flabby" may have been too harsh but the girl is not SG skinny. Maybe she was during her peak skinniness like some of the pics that have been posted, but to me she just seems way too average, height and body, to look at her as any source of thin-inspiration. @lolitasea is the only one who can testify though and tell me if I'm wrong!
Some daily mail pics from Aug 2017 - pudgy arms, can't even see her xylo, yawn, next!
I stand corrected...she works out (reluctantly)
If I passed by her on the street in real life, I would probably think she was super pretty and/or skinny. However, here, alongside beautiful and interesting models, she does not stand out too me.
Well, if you don't like her now, compare it to her first polaroids.
I really like Paige and I think she's gorgeous. But she is definitely suited for catalogue and editorial work, i.e.,
She's just a really funny and cool person, that's why I'm taken with her.
Agreed- as a former model and current model scout I sort of always classified girls into three categories.
Some girls are almost dull in person, they don't have that beauty that takes your breath away, but when you take a peek at their book you see why they work because the camera loves them and they transform in photos and with hair and makeup.
Then there is the model that is stunning in person, but the kind of "living" beauty that does not quite translate as spectacularly on camera for whatever reason, maybe just not as photogenic.
Then of course, the model that is equally stunning on and off camera and can do no wrong .
I would say Paige is a type 1... She's definitely super pretty, but when I pointed out to my guy friends that there was a model I knew of at the table across they couldn't even tell which table or which girl I was talking about, and the other girls weren't models . She reminds me of the pretty girls in high school. And she had oysters.
I'm returning to this thread again, perhaps against my better judgment, to reiterate the point that I made last year, which seems to have been prescient enough despite being against the grain at the time. Maybe it was @FashionThin 's blessing that gave me the confidence to bring this debate back
Paige for Calzedonia:
In my opinion, when Toni Garrn (who is also some years older?) starts to look better than you, it's not a good sign...
I also respect the fact that some girls on here consider this to be skinny enough. But in my opinion it's simply not exceptional and certainly not inspiring.
Arms look really good in this video
Her body is looking good but otherwise she's so basic LA blonde I couldn't pick her out of a line up with a gun to my head and a million quid on the line.