Kate Bosworth

S

Smaller&Smaller

Guest
If she's going to tie her hair back, I think more delicate earrings would suit her more. Big earrings with hair back make it look like the earrings are pulling her ears down due to their weight. It's actually just her ear shape, which I think is very cute usually, but needs delicate ornamentation rather than heavy!

Love her consistently thin figure and doll face. Shame about the too dark makeup above. She suits porcelain rather than tan.
 

habenula

Grand Dame
Joined
Mar 31, 2014
Posts
795
Karma
2,482
Location
somewhere
XcZejiH.jpg

she is amazing to me :bow:
her body looks really great in this, but something about the skin her face looks almost too tight and pinched. her hair also seems to be pulling on her face. i don't know, she's very beautiful but a little bit strained looking above the neck.
 
V

Vladislava

Guest
At the Met Ball:

rexfeatures-3731769bt.jpg
I think Kate is a good example of a thin pear. She's thin enough that it's not a major issue. But I personally wouldn't choose that dress for her, since I think it accentuates her pear-shaped figure.
 

dietcokediet

Super Star
Joined
May 30, 2013
Posts
2,182
Karma
1,392
Location
Buenos Aires
Sometimes her legs look average and other times they look really skinny and amazing. But I don't think this is due to yo-yo'ing. ???
 
G

gymtiger

Guest
her perfect legs aside, can we please talk about how beautiful her eyes are too??



maybe just me, but I always thought 2 different eye colors were just the coolest thing ever
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

Arctic

Rookie
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Posts
183
Karma
146
Location
France
I would guess 110-115? Maybe 32-24-32/33? Her legs are lovely but her upper body hasn't always been the best (still a skinny beauty regardless).
If she's really 1m65 ( 5'5) I doubt she's more than 100 pounds ( I'm 5'4 and even at 92 pounds I look bigger then her). I think your measurements are probably close to reality. Maybe an inch more for her hips ( for me, they appear to be quite large, which makes are legs looking skinnier ).
 

Xsmall

Super Star
Joined
Apr 22, 2012
Posts
3,158
Karma
1,294
Location
Chicago
If she's really 1m65 ( 5'5) I doubt she's more than 100 pounds ( I'm 5'4 and even at 92 pounds I look bigger then her). I think your measurements are probably close to reality. Maybe an inch more for her hips ( for me, they appear to be quite large, which makes are legs looking skinnier ).
Well that was a pure guess. I honestly have no clue, but she doesn't look under 100.
 

espressoenthusiast

SkinnyGossip Royal
Joined
Jun 27, 2012
Posts
3,868
Karma
8,195
If she's really 1m65 ( 5'5) I doubt she's more than 100 pounds ( I'm 5'4 and even at 92 pounds I look bigger then her). I think your measurements are probably close to reality. Maybe an inch more for her hips ( for me, they appear to be quite large, which makes are legs looking skinnier ).
I guarantee she is bigger than you are if you are 92 and 5'4--could be a case of body dysmorphia or not really appreciating how small you are. I was 5'5 and 95 at one point and much frailer and thinner than Kate, and have extremely small bones. My best guess is that she is between 102-105 with low body fat % given that pictures make you look bigger pretty easily
 

Arctic

Rookie
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Posts
183
Karma
146
Location
France
I guarantee she is bigger than you are if you are 92 and 5'4--could be a case of body dysmorphia or not really appreciating how small you are. I was 5'5 and 95 at one point and much frailer and thinner than Kate, and have extremely small bones. My best guess is that she is between 102-105 with low body fat % given that pictures make you look bigger pretty easily
After seeing picture of her naked ( leaked) I have to say that you are probably right. I always believed that she had a tiny waist, but she has a thick one and... Boobs ! :wtf: