Frida Aasen

Discussion in 'Models' started by Skinny2012, May 17, 2012.

  1. FailedSupermodel

    FailedSupermodel Rising Star

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2017
    Messages:
    270
    I think that outfit hid her waist. Its cute but they should have gotten rid of that fluff area and just kept the whole thing see through.
    Her waist so so iconic, why hide it!?
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  2. jenniex

    jenniex Worker Bee

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2018
    Messages:
    203
    Agree. There was many other girls this time who would've benefitted from that top instead..
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. clairefhjao

    clairefhjao Grand Dame

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2015
    Messages:
    1,103
    'Sixties-Inspired Sreen Tests' by CR Fashion Book Online (November 2018)

    Real life barbie.

    1AF8013D-26B0-4765-BD03-1AE1C48A6F7D.jpeg 35E472AB-676B-49CA-81F5-34F853FC1DE0.jpeg
     
    • Like Like x 2
  4. proseccoprincess

    proseccoprincess Grand Dame

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2018
    Messages:
    846

    ;)
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  5. Delirium

    Delirium Super Star

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2014
    Messages:
    1,109
    It's been removed. This is why we need screenshots, people.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Jizztastic Jizztastic x 1
  6. proseccoprincess

    proseccoprincess Grand Dame

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2018
    Messages:
    846
    It was a video, or else I would have screenshotted :( here it is on another page, hopefully this one survives?!?!
     
    • Like Like x 3
  7. proseccoprincess

    proseccoprincess Grand Dame

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2018
    Messages:
    846
    [​IMG]
    At Laquan Smith- unfortunate for her that the outfit completely coves up her waist and focuses on her legs instead.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  8. NewYorkSkinny

    NewYorkSkinny Community Duchess

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2017
    Messages:
    1,105

    She made sure we saw that her legs look better in motion. :luvluv: Her face is enough to distract me.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
    • Love Love x 1
  9. NewYorkSkinny

    NewYorkSkinny Community Duchess

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2017
    Messages:
    1,105
    FA7E2236-FC67-4A6F-BAFB-23A9C88EABD0.jpeg
     
    • Love Love x 2
    • Like Like x 1
    • Jizztastic Jizztastic x 1
  10. stargirl

    stargirl Grand Dame

    Joined:
    May 24, 2018
    Messages:
    687
    01D361DA-C6A5-40E3-BE9D-DE8E488E7ACF.jpeg

    Saw this whilst eating lunch.... suddenly I’m full :ijizzed:
     
    • Jizztastic Jizztastic x 6
    • Love Love x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. Plume

    Plume Grand Dame

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2016
    Messages:
    783
    holy shit *printing it out and sticking it on my fridge*
     
    • Like Like x 1
  12. xxAudreyxx

    xxAudreyxx Worker Bee

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2017
    Messages:
    104
    FC8A27E1-479C-4E38-B53D-D56209E50A86.jpeg

    I think she is a classic pear. She must be the master of posing to make her thighs and hips look skinnier because, while her arms always seem to look good, here is a more objective shot showing that her lower half is softer and fuller than other pictures may suggest.
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
  13. smallthing

    smallthing Super Star

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2017
    Messages:
    576
    It’s like her hips and thighs belong to a completely different person :wtf:
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  14. marie.model

    marie.model Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2018
    Messages:
    34
    Any guesses for her weight?
     
  15. NewYorkSkinny

    NewYorkSkinny Community Duchess

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2017
    Messages:
    1,105
    2A1066A2-123E-461B-9ED4-4C2A06699DB4.jpeg
     
    • Love Love x 3
    • Like Like x 1
  16. marie.model

    marie.model Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2018
    Messages:
    34
    2fdc73a3-7035-4970-8dfd-21502ce64f95.jpg
     
    • Like Like x 3
  17. stargirl

    stargirl Grand Dame

    Joined:
    May 24, 2018
    Messages:
    687
    Given that she’s 5’9 (she looks shorter though but I think that’s just the legs), 110? It’s hard to say— she’s small but just looks... idk... heavy. Not even in a bad way. But yeah I’d say 110lbs as a rough, maybe generous, estimate.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  18. marie.model

    marie.model Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2018
    Messages:
    34
    Thank you. Lol the lower I get, the farther I realize I am. But that does seem to line up with a few other models with similar stats.
     
  19. proseccoprincess

    proseccoprincess Grand Dame

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2018
    Messages:
    846
    I'm 5'9 and 110 and have entirely different weight distribution than Frida but it still seems plausible. She might be 115 at the highest if she has a bit of muscle mass- I agree with @stargirl that she "looks heavy", not fat or out of shape, just I guess looks natural/not emaciated at all at low weights?
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1

Share This Page