Sanne Vloet

Lost some weight or more good angles/photoshop?

IMO neither, tbh. Still very thick thighs and butt. Her arms aren't good either. She is very conventionally pretty but the weight gain is making her look "average sexy/pretty" if that makes sense.

Also, the butt:

A6GF3ua.jpg


is great for a lad mag / jizz rag but....

:seeya:
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 3 users
Honestly can't see much if any of a difference, thighs look still as soft and arms just as flabby :yawn:
Oh true true, she still doesn't look great by any means. She has virtually no tone and looks like a basic cali girl. It sort of looked like her arm/thigh area was a bit slimmer in the last two photos but the way she's posed in them looks like she's back to the good ol' photoshop and skinny angles. And the butt bikini photo definitely was gross.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 1 user
I did try to edit my original message when I realised FashionThin replied as well but I timed out just as I finished. I'm sorry about double-posting, I need to learn how to type faster.

IMO neither, tbh. Still very thick thighs and butt. Her arms aren't good either. She is very conventionally pretty but the weight gain is making her look "average sexy/pretty" if that makes sense.

Also, the butt:

A6GF3ua.jpg


is great for a lad mag / jizz rag but....

:seeya:

Yes! I just saw your reply as well. That's definitely what I meant by basic Cali girl. She's quite conventionally pretty but in no way unique or particularly memorable. I just really wish some of these girls would finally slim down and realise how good they could look. I keep seeing girls look almost better on their instagram and get my hopes up that they've finally seen the light.

But I guess the attention they get from guys fapping to their pictures is too nice to give up... :superpuke:
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 2 users
I guess the attention they get from guys fapping to their pictures is too nice to give up... :superpuke:

Nothing gross about making gobs of money, which is easy when you have the lad-mag look and get $10k a day for "companionship". :whistling:
 
  • Love
  • Agree
Reactions: 1 users
Nothing gross about making gobs of money, which is easy when you have the lad-mag look and get $10k a day for "companionship". :whistling:

Your comment made me think of the following infamous exchange involving Winston Churchill:

Churchill: "Madam, would you sleep with me for five million pounds?"
Socialite: "My goodness, Mr. Churchill... Well, I suppose... we would have to discuss terms, of course... "
Churchill: "Would you sleep with me for five pounds?"
Socialite: "Mr. Churchill, what kind of woman do you think I am?!"
Churchill: "Madam, we've already established what kind of woman you are. Now we are just haggling about the price”

🤣🤣🤣
 
  • Funny
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users


she looks so big and average (maybe worse)... :nopity: her waist is also nowhere to be found... just because it’s healthy, doesn’t mean you should be consuming massive amounts of calories of it
 
  • Gross
Reactions: 3 users


she looks so big and average (maybe worse)... :nopity: her waist is also nowhere to be found... just because it’s healthy, doesn’t mean you should be consuming massive amounts of calories of it

If it weren’t in her thread, I wouldn’t have had the slightest clue who this was
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 5 users
  • Gross
  • WTF
  • Agree
Reactions: 4 users
Might be the angle but I kind of think her legs don't look too bad.
57690


And her upper arm looks ok on this one as well. (If you can ignore the rest of her arm or her thighs)
57691
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: 1 users
Not sure when this was filmed but her arms are not looking like her latest Instagram post. Good angles for stills but on video the truth comes out :whistling:. Additionally... the words model and mukbang should never be used in the same sentence... I get her using the term for a clickbait-esque title but regardless the narrative of models eating extraneous amounts is annoying to say the least.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 6 users
Sorry if it's a bit OT but does anyone else thinks that model in the video with her looks a bit like Sasha Luss?? I feel that maybe with a few pounds less she would be stunning!!!
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Am I the only one who finds her exposed butt @ 4:15 absolutely disgusting? I'm not a prude, but jeeeez, this is not very classy.

 
  • WTF
  • Disagree
  • Funny
Reactions: 4 users

Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against nudity! In fact, I love acts and sheer tops and appreciate female body very much. But when I see shorts like that the first thing that pops to my mind is:

3674625604_cdfd38010c_b.jpg

hotpants.jpg

I just can't stand them half-cut shorts! Just cannot. I find them gross. If you want to show your butt take them off, wear a bikini on the beach... I find them absolutely unflattering no matter how skinny a person is. To me, it's a definition of kitsch.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 1 user
Couldn't agree more with @FlatWhite - those kind of shorts are the biggest faux-pas in fashion and is an instant turn-off in its trashiness. Except for the kitsch part - kitsch can be interesting and amusing sometimes meanwhile shorts so small that show the buttocks, can not.

It's like if there was a guide book on how to dress for your body type, it should be made clear on the first page already that those kind of shorts don't look good on ANYONE.

I feel very strongly about this and not in a positive light :smash: :smash: Fucking hate that style.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Am I the only one who finds her exposed butt @ 4:15 absolutely disgusting? I'm not a prude, but jeeeez, this is not very classy.

I honestly felt the same way watching the vid! I think because usually Sanne comes off more elegant and upscale (like most models should) that when I saw that it was like a direct contrast to my perception of her! Nothing wrong with it just caught me off guard lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user