Yes, it's a well known fact now! Her face is painfully average, I think she was smart to make such good connections in the fashion world, that's what is keeping her alive, because she's like a C list actress. Her body is not good to me (or anyone in this forum) but it does represents the ideal for many women: slim and w big boobs. That's pretty much it.She is sooooooo short in person it's SHOCKING, probably 5'4
I mean, I agree with what you're saying but I wouldn't even call her slim anymore. She's in Bella Hadid territory, but not even tall.Yes, it's a well known fact now! Her face is painfully average, I think she was smart to make such good connections in the fashion world, that's what is keeping her alive, because she's like a C list actress. Her body is not good to me (or anyone in this forum) but it does represents the ideal for many women: slim and w big boobs. That's pretty much it.
What the fuck I'm gonna have nightmares. I literally cannot understand how can this be considered in any way attractive or sexy.
What the fuck I'm gonna have nightmares. I literally cannot understand how can this be considered in any way attractive or sexy.
2) "Sexiness may be conditioned by a patriarchal ideal" (paraphrase) + "the way I flirt, dance, have sex [i.e. my sexiness?] are my decisions and shouldn't be impacted by men" HONESTLY.
I like the idea but this woman is the wrong one to implement it. Everything I see from her is always screaming "SEX SELLS!" into my face. It's like she can't do anything else so she has to stick out with being (too) sexy. That doesn't mean I find it sexy of course.Also I find the whole "I perform femininity for MYSELF and it's DEFINITELY NOT ABOUT MEN" argument to be so tired. It's not inherently wrong to want look/act a certain way, but we shouldn't kid ourselves into thinking that it has nothing to do with the way our culture influences us.
Please don't tell me these really are considered persuasive polemics? Besides her vacuous points (my life, my choices! nude or burka, it's all okay!), there's this:
1) A woman feels empowered if she feels empowered? No shit, Aristotle. This is literally the definition of circular reasoning.
2) "Sexiness may be conditioned by a patriarchal ideal" (paraphrase) + "the way I flirt, dance, have sex [i.e. my sexiness?] are my decisions and shouldn't be impacted by men" HONESTLY.
And here I was thinking Ms. Ratatootsie couldn't possibly provide anything more inane than her previous confession, "I love pasta and being greased up in olive oil more than life itself".
I was wrong.
It's pathetic because her whole career is about men, I don't care how many times she's going to tell me that she's a feminist and she's expressing herself bla bla bla. The way she marketed herself since the beginning (and keeps on doing so) was for a certain target just like Kate Upton. There is nudity that is artful and liberating and other that is just to sell and keep boys interested - nothing wrong with that! She's free to do whatever she wants! But I would believe her more if she opened up to that, like, 'yeah, my body is the typical teenage boy wet fantasy and I got rich because of these losers' instead of seeing that she does it for the women and for expressing herself. Sorry but I don't see how doing Sports Illustrated is liberating or the manifest of feminism. I mean it gets you money and she's surely been smart, we could call her a business woman so good for her but it stops there. And also, she needs to stop believing she's Sophia Loren, she's fucking notAm I reading this wrong or is she literally contradicting herself? Also I find the whole "I perform femininity for MYSELF and it's DEFINITELY NOT ABOUT MEN" argument to be so tired. It's not inherently wrong to want look/act a certain way, but we shouldn't kid ourselves into thinking that it has nothing to do with the way our culture influences us.
So bored of that logic, especially from the "eyeliner wings sharp enough to cut a man" crowd. Snooze.